• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Zelenskyy tried to surrender and Boris Johnson stopped him?! Ooooookay… He maaaybe (all “unnamed” sources) expressed an opinion, which the U.K. learnt the hard way, that you cannot negotiate with dictators. There can be no “peace in our time” with dictators hellbent on destruction.

    To cast that as “Ukraine was stopped from surrendering” is just obscene … and yet another Kremlin talking point.

    • Tankiedesantski [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7110 months ago

      which the U.K. learnt the hard way, that you cannot negotiate with dictators. There can be no “peace in our time” with dictators hellbent on destruction.

      If the UK is convinced that you can’t negotiate with dictators, how does the UK keep entering into arms sales agreements with Saudi Arabia? Do the contracts just appear out of thin air at BAE?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Sigh.

        I am referencing to a dictator that is hellbent on invasion of other countries. We had plenty of relations with Russia before they decided to invade Ukraine and they were a dictatorship before. We have plenty of relationships with China now and they are a de facto dictatorship.

        • Tankiedesantski [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8210 months ago

          The Saudis used their British weapons to bomb Yemen and create one of the worst humanitarian catastrophes in recent memory. The UK sold weapons to Saudi before, during, and after the Saudi involvement in Yemen.

          Perhaps Russia should have merely bombed Ukraine to the point of starvation. Then they’d be a good dictatorship that the UK would be happy to carry out business negotiations with.

          • Adkml [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6610 months ago

            Don’t be ridiculous

            Ukrainians are white

            That’s only acceptable when it’s brown, asian, or south american people who’s country you’re destroying.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            210 months ago

            What’s going on in Yemen is incredibly complicated. I’m not condoning everything Saudi Arabia is doing there, far from it, but to call it out as a good vs evil war is frankly a simpleton view. Saudi is bad there. Everyone is bad there. It’s a huge mess. But I think it’s important to recognise that the Saudis aim is to restore order in a neighbourhood country, to prevent Iranian influence from growing and to suppress violent Islamic fundamentalism.

            • HornyOnMain [she/her]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              6410 months ago

              the Saudis aim is to restore order in a neighbourhood country

              hitler-detector

              When I started reading this thread I really did not expect you to start defending Saudi Arabia to own the tankies ngl

              • Flaps [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2910 months ago

                They did say saudis bad tho, we should give the same nuance we expect from others. I don’t suppose the commenter you’re replying to supports Saudi arabia, it’s just odd that the nuance they’re seemingly willing to grant the saudis wont be given to Russia

            • Tankiedesantski [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              61
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              What’s going on in Ukraine is incredibly complicated. I’m not condoning everything Russia is doing there, far from it, but to call it out as a good vs evil war is frankly a simpleton view. Russia is bad there. Everyone is bad there. It’s a huge mess. But I think it’s important to recognise that the Russians’ aim is to restore order in a neighbourhood country, to prevent American influence from growing and to suppress violent Neo-Nazi extremism.

                • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  I think sending a nazi-ish mercenarygroup into the meat grinder against an even more nazi-ish group so that they both wipe each other out (like what happened in Bahkmut) is good actually

            • ThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              5910 months ago

              to prevent Iranian influence from growing and to suppress violent Islamic fundamentalism.

              Lol, Iran is more moderate than Saudi Arabia and bombing and starving populations is how you create radicals.

              • Stylistillusional [none/use name]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                19
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                When it’s the US/West doing something there’s all this room for ‘nuance’ but when it is Bad Country it’s suddenly clear-cut good vs evil.

            • NuraShiny [any]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1910 months ago

              Holy shit man just realize you have no ideology or clue, stop talking and educate yourself on what the actual fuck is going on in the world. It would be a far more productive use of your time.

            • WittyProfileName2 [she/her]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1710 months ago

              But I think it’s important to recognise that the Saudis aim is to restore order in a neighbourhood country, to prevent Iranian influence from growing and to suppress violent Islamic fundamentalism.

              “Restoring order is when you bomb hospitals and exacerbate famines and the more people that die, the more order it is.”

              The Saudis are committing genocide in Yemen. No ifs, no buts. To claim they have a good reason to be out there doing it is genocide apologia.

            • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1510 months ago

              prevent Iranian influence from growing and to suppress violent Islamic fundamentalism.

              yeah the saudis are really worried about Islamic fundamentalism

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5210 months ago

          I am referencing to a dictator that is hellbent on invasion of other countries

          Yemen isn’t a country because it isn’t white enough for you

        • Gelamzer [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          810 months ago

          Ironic that you accuse others of reapting Kremlin talking points while vomiting the most generic pro Nato shit

    • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5710 months ago

      Russia and Ukraine may have agreed on a tentative deal to end the war in April, according to a recent piece in Foreign Affairs.

      “Russian and Ukrainian negotiators appeared to have tentatively agreed on the outlines of a negotiated interim settlement,” wrote Fiona Hill and Angela Stent. “Russia would withdraw to its position on February 23, when it controlled part of the Donbas region and all of Crimea, and in exchange, Ukraine would promise not to seek NATO membership and instead receive security guarantees from a number of countries.”

      The news highlights the impact of former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s efforts to stop negotiations, as journalist Branko Marcetic noted on Twitter. The decision to scuttle the deal coincided with Johnson’s April visit to Kyiv, during which he reportedly urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to break off talks with Russia for two key reasons: Putin cannot be negotiated with, and the West isn’t ready for the war to end.

      Foreign Affairs is a Kremlin propaganda outlet now?

        • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4010 months ago

          Lol exactly, it’s the last place you’d expect to find anything challenging the U.S. narrative.

          • Adkml [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4410 months ago

            Considering there’s people in this thread complaining were spreading Russian propaganda by posting a press release FROM UKRAINE I’m starting to think their accusations may not be entirely in good faith.

        • AOCapitulator [they/them]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5310 months ago

          And your sources for your beliefs are where?

          Or do only people you disagree with require sources, so that way you can keep gleefully believing whatever the fucking and spewing it everywhere you go

        • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5010 months ago

          Johnson’s April visit to Kyiv, during which he reportedly urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to break off talks with Russia

          Hmm let’s look at the source on that: Ukrainska Pravda, a Ukranian language paper headquartered in Kyiv, owned by a Ukranian investment company also headquartered in Kyiv.

          Kremlin propaganda!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -110 months ago

            Sigh.

            You do understand how propaganda works, right? It works by zooming in on molehills until they appear like mountains. So while I wouldn’t rule out that Johnson the Idiot said something unwise to Zelensky government, I also don’t automatically think that it means Zelenski was “forced to not give up”.

            • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4910 months ago

              Sigh

              farquaad-point redditor!

              I also don’t automatically think that it means Zelenski was “forced to not give up”.

              1. Ukraine negotiates ceasefire.
              2. BJ tells Ukraine to not go through with it.
              3. Ukraine does not go through with it.

              Why else would Ukraine have reversed course if not for one of its NATO puppetmasters commanding it to? Either it’s that, or BJ making a really impassioned argument for sending a bunch of Ukranians to an early grave and Zelensky fell for it, or Zelensky just changed his mind all on his own and the timing is a pure coincidence.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                010 months ago

                What leverage exactly do you think Johnson had over Ukraine? He hasn’t even got leverage over his toilet seat.

                • Egon [they/them]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  3310 months ago

                  Fuck you’re not even sighing anymore, you’re really invested now, aren’t you?
                  Also nice goalpost movement, you’re a dickhead

            • Egon [they/them]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4510 months ago

              You are not immune to propaganda.
              Who gives a shit what you “wouldn’t rule out” when even western media goes against you? Get your head out of your ass

            • ThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4210 months ago

              Okay, but it is literally a propaganda source that is aligned with Ukraine lmao. We know it is propaganda, we are presenting it because even the ukrainian propaganda acknowledges it as factual.