• NotMyOldRedditName
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    All they had to do was make a special agreement for 3rd party apps that require vetting to get cheaper API access. Then you can keep the higher price for other non mobile app uses. It’s still baffling that RIF had a profit sharing agreement with Reddit that /u/spez exited from and then goes onto act like they’re all freeloaders.

    • @canOP
      link
      91 year ago

      I did not know that RIF detail. It just gets worse.

      • NotMyOldRedditName
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        https://www.theverge.com/2023/6/16/23763661/reddit-rif-is-fun-developer-ceo-steve-huffman

        Shu also tells me that RIF was paying a “sizable revenue share” to Reddit beginning in 2012, which was during Yishan Wong’s tenure as CEO. Shu says he says initiated the talks with Reddit to create the agreement, which allowed for the licensed use of Reddit’s trademarks. (At the time, the app was called “reddit is fun.”) Shu says Reddit terminated the agreement in 2016 — which was the year after Huffman took over as CEO.

        Looks like revenue share even, not profit share? But that could be wrong terms used?

        • @canOP
          link
          21 year ago

          I think revenue would make sense, no? Love your username btw.

          • NotMyOldRedditName
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Well revenue means that RIF would have to pay reddit some amount, even if that amount left them unprofitable. Profit sharing would mean RIF would at least need to be profitable first. So for reddit revenue share is better, for RIF a profit sharing one would be better.

            And thanks:)