• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    310 months ago

    You can be the best in the world and still not be good enough.

    Driving a car around using a dozen cameras pointing in every direction isn’t something that’s fundamentally impossible. We just can’t do it yet.

      • @merc
        link
        English
        210 months ago

        As well as human hearing, human touch, human balance / proprioiception, possibly even smell too.

        If a person is rear ended, they might not even see the car that hit them, but they know they’re hit based on how the impact moves their body. If a tire blows out on the highway, the first thing a driver might notice is that the steering wheel feels sluggish. I could even imagine a situation where someone driving sees something unusual up ahead and then smells something dangerous, and turns around in time to avoid driving into an active chemical spill. In that situation seeing alone might not be enough to signal the danger.

        I would hope that a competent self-driving car design at least incorporates microphones, and some kind of “body” sensors that would notice an impact, notice changes to balance, and so-on.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      310 months ago

      You can be the best in the world and still not be good enough

      So you haven’t recognized that other car brands’ assistance/autonomous systems make less dramatic mistakes?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        Literally a different thread about someone dieing from a Cruize self driving car not moving over for an ambulance.

        • @merc
          link
          English
          210 months ago

          Dying… because he was hit by a human driven car. Maybe the Cruize cars exacerbated the problem, but the original problem was that the victim was hit by a car driven by a human being.