• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5710 months ago

    More importantly, hold musk responsible for the mayhem. They call it “full self driving” when it has not qualified to be called that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1610 months ago

      I agree. However, I also acknowledge that with the US’s legal fiction that “Corporations are people,” it’s unlikely that any CEO will ever be held personally responsible for anything except failing to make enough profit for greedy moneygrubbers.

    • Neato
      link
      fedilink
      910 months ago

      Yeah that’s straight fraud. FTC should penalize them for every fsd car sold. And make them liable for each crash when it was enabled.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -110 months ago

      Well, it’s a beta for “full self driving” and it’s really quite easy to argue that it even is capable of doing that. It’s just not really close to the required certainty. It propably acts fine in 99%+ of decisions. It’s just such a bitch to get that last percent filled in as much as required

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I’ll clarify, I don’t mind it being called FSD beta because that is the end goal, but Elon has tweeted about FSD being “released” and very public accidents have occurred shortly afterwards. He should be adding disclaimers all over, but instead he makes it sound like it’s totally safe.