FAA warns of possible defect in Boeing 777 engines::undefined

    • fiah@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      definitely not, but wouldn’t it be nice if people who know nothing about a particular subject just keep quiet about it and learn?

      • shashi154263@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        It would be nicer if people knew about that particular subject wouldn’t make fun of others .

        • gravitas_deficiency
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nah. We’re not being assholes. We’re irritated because you’re clearly done absolutely ZERO digging on the topic, and are just throwing out wildly inaccurate statements, and then expecting everyone to bring the info to you - not, I suspect, that you’ll actually read any of it.

    • LifeInOregon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, but the difference is in the linked article. The commenter in question would have likely been able to understand that the real issue was with GE, not Boeing if they’d read more than the headline.