• @JohnDClay
    link
    -5
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Best case scenario, rent is low and only covers taxes and building upkeep. Then you’re essentially getting a zero interest loan since property is valuable and it’s being loaned for free.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      1510 months ago

      Rent is obscene virtually everywhere. Rent should not preclude someone from saving money towards owning their own home, and it really does.

      • Hot Saucerman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Also, the available, functionally livable land is going to quickly get smaller with climate change. So the more viable land is hoarded, the more people are pushed into desperate and bad living situations. (For example, who are the people with homes on coastlines affected by rising sea levels going to actually sell their soon-to-be-underwater property to? Won’t it effectively be valueless under water?)

        https://www.semafor.com/article/11/02/2022/climate-change-alters-way-of-life-in-michigans-upper-peninsula

        Michigan’s Upper Peninsula is being gentrified because it’s an area least likely to be affected by climate change. A lot of the mega-rich are buying property around that area.

        • @JohnDClay
          link
          210 months ago

          Yeah, that’ll push the prices up even higher.

      • @JohnDClay
        link
        3
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I don’t disagree. Obscenely high rent is common and bad. That means the interest on the loan that you are getting is extremely high. The solutions would be subsiding it by government owned housing, allowing new housing (especially high density) to be built, and discouraging people from living in cities. I think we should do both the first two.