• hypelightfly
    link
    fedilink
    -5
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    AMD blocks partners from implementing DLSS. You’re probably right that it’s not paid bullshit as the payout isn’t monetary. But it’s still being blocked due to the partnership.

    This is hardly the first game to do this. Jedi Survivor, RE4 have the same problem. AMD sponsored FSR2 only. The work required to implement FSR2 or DLSS is basically the same (motion data). That’s why DLSS mods were immediately available.

    Since FSR2 was released not a single AMD sponsored game has DLSS added. Even games done in engines like unreal where all the dev has to do is include the plugin.

        • Kayn
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Is there actual evidence for AMD blocking DLSS?

          And no, AMD being a sponsor is not sufficient evidence.

          • hypelightfly
            link
            fedilink
            210 months ago

            There is circumstantial evidence, no direct evidence as contracts are not public. There is no evidence, (circumstantial or direct) that AMD is allowing partners to add DLSS.

            Every single AMD sponsored game released since FSR2 launched does not include DLSS despite it being trivial to add if the work is being done for FSR2. For Unreal engine games it can be enabled by including a completely free plugin, the work is already done. Yet, the AMD sponsored games don’t. There is even a game that announced DLSS support before it released and then removed it after becoming AMD sponsored (Boundary).