• BruceTwarzen
    link
    fedilink
    -18 months ago

    This is the moat insane thing i have ever heard. Or it’s some sort of burn because how shit they are.

    • all-knight-party
      link
      fedilink
      38 months ago

      I’ve never played 76, but 4 is one of my favorite games of all time. I think most people who didn’t like it were going into it desiring for it to be something it wasn’t. What it was impeccably good at was being a scavenging looter shooter with addicting weapon and armor modification and a fun outpost building system that wasn’t for me, but did let me make my own little home.

      • @CaptainEffort
        link
        English
        88 months ago

        I just wanted a well written rpg. Guess that’s on me.

        • all-knight-party
          link
          fedilink
          58 months ago

          Definitely not Bethesda’s strong suit and not what I go to their games for. Their NPC interaction is made up of tons of awkward TMI introductions and dialogue too quirky to take seriously most of the time. That’s a valid criticism, I would not say Fallout 4 is well written. I think it has some interesting premises like the whole synth idea, but not a well executed story.

          The only overall story I really thought was good in that game was Paladin Danse’s quest chain.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        48 months ago

        This. I completely agree. Fallout 4 is a great looter shooter. If you take it light and breezy you’re going to have fun.

        It is not an RPG where your actions have impact on the world.

        • @abraxas
          link
          English
          18 months ago

          Honestly, the same is sorta true with most Bethesda game going back. Short of the atomic bomb in FO3, it’s just minor dialog changes most of the time.

          I don’t get the FO4 hate from the FO3/FO-NV fans. They’re all three equivalently immersive.