Edit

I kinda made this post out of spite for the fact the most previous post in this community, whose title I quoted/copied, was getting so many downvotes… At the time I posted this, the previous post had about a 30% downvote rate, and it really, really made me mad.

I am relieved tho to see people in the comments here who have real, actual empathy for their fellow humans. Thank you for contributing here.

It blows my mind how normalized it is to hate on those who are struggling. Especially in 20fucking23 when so many of us now are on the verge of it ourselves. Let’s be better, everyone - to everyone. I beg you.

  • @Bluescluestoothpaste
    link
    23
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    You don’t need to be an empathetic holistic person to get behind free housing for the homeIess. If you’re a truly selfish and purely economically oriented person, then you have to admit giving the homless free homes is economically the best solution for all involved. Alternatives include the taxpayer eating the cost of all the damage they do seeking shelter and survival, or paying a ton of money to police to violently deal with them.

    If you prefer those to giving them housing, you’re choosing options that are more cruel and more costly – I don’t understand how that makes sense and yet plenty of people seem to choose that.

    • poVoq
      link
      fedilink
      2010 months ago

      Because many people perceive homelessness as a proxy for moral failings (such as drug abuse) worthy of punishment.

      Of course this is rarely the full picture or even true at all, but we need to get people to understand that this is not a problem that can be solved by punishing people.

      • @Bluescluestoothpaste
        link
        110 months ago

        Totally agree, just frustrating to try to communicate with people who say they are pro-business and rational, and then they vehemently make emotional moral/spiritual arguments.