• MapleEngineer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1610 months ago

        I don’t care either way. Literally don’t care.

        I’m smart enough, though, to know that it’s being used as a dog whistle to whip up populist nationalism which is never a good thing for a country.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        910 months ago

        That goes both ways though. Wouldn’t the effort and cost to remove them be wasted if they don’t actually do anything. Lots of people struggling right now and I’d be pretty pissed if the government went around spending time and money on this

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      610 months ago

      It doesn’t affect us day-to-day no, but honestly I like being part of a ‘Commonwealth’. I like feeling like I have something in common with Australia, or New Zealand, or the UK, even if I’ve only ever been to the UK for a few hours.

      Your family name (for most people, unless you’re George Hitler) has no impact on your day-to-day, this to me seems like saying “We should just get rid of family names!”

      • MapleEngineer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        510 months ago

        The people who are being manipulated with this nationalist dog whistle see no value in being a member of the Commonwealth. Canada First and MCGA and all.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It is a mistake to assume that those of us who oppose monarchy are Canadian nationalists.

          Some people simply hate outdated hereditary titles. They have no place in a democracy.

      • TheZoltan
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        You don’t need to keep the Royal Family to stay in the Commonwealth. Take a look at the current members of the commonwealth.

      • MapleEngineer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 months ago

        They won’t. We live in a constitutional monarchy. Their role is ceremonial.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 months ago

          That’s what Australia thought until they elected a socialist and suddenly the Queen’s representative was running the country.