• abraxas
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Just a reminder that in France, it was people like him that were deciding who went to the guillotine. The French Revolution was a win for the bourgiousie against the aristocracy. People constantly refer to it when talking about rich people. But it was a capitalist coup.

    Think “modern US Republican Party” and you’ll understand the dynamics of the French Revolution. Wealthy businessmen whipping up the common man to be their front-line. Was capitalism better than aristocracy? Sure. But the situation is different now.

    IMO, we really need to find a better point of reference than guillotines

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also it was called the Reign of Terror for a reason, but 17 year-old edgelords never actually finished the chapter on the French Revolution.

      • abraxas
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Violent coups always are. They create a power vacuum, and it is NEVER filled with people who want to do nothing but give you free things.

        I don’t support capitalism, but thinking guillotines for the rich (even figuratively) are the answer is short-sighted.