• Bernie EcclestonedOP
    link
    English
    1010 months ago

    “We know that polyethylene, for example, is made of 86% carbon and 14% hydrogen, and we demonstrated that we are able to recover up to 68% of that atomic hydrogen as gas with a 94% purity,” Wyss said. "Developing the methods and expertise to characterize and quantify all the gases, including hydrogen, produced by this method was a difficult but rewarding process for me

    The hero we need

    • @MonkCanatella
      link
      English
      710 months ago

      Not quite. This is greenwashing. the company funding the research is the world’s largest offshore drilling company. You got suckered or are trying to sucker in other people

      • Bernie EcclestonedOP
        link
        English
        0
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Rice University are greenwashing?

        And so what if an energy company is paying for research into hydrogen and plastic waste upcycling?

        Edit. the United States Army Corps of Engineers gave them funding…

        • @MonkCanatella
          link
          English
          410 months ago

          The army is one of the biggest ghg emitters in the world. Now I’m certain you’re just sharing propaganda. Why would a fossil fuel company push hydrogen technology? Because hydrogen production requires fossil fuels.

          • Bernie EcclestonedOP
            link
            English
            0
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Woah there buddy. You said it was the biggest offshore drilling company a minute ago and cast aspersions over the scientists involved at Rice

            Hydrogen does not require fossil fuels…

            This company makes ammonium nitrate from renewable energy and green hydrogen

            https://www.atlasagro.ag/

            Maybe pump your brakes calling everyone propagandists until you actually understand the technology involved

      • Bernie EcclestonedOP
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Doesn’t say, but if the electricity used is from renewables then it’s irrelevant, as it can potentially produce graphene at 5% of the current price

        Found this re co2

        Compared to commercial methods for carbon nanotube production that are being used right now, ours uses about 90% less energy and generates 90%-94% less carbon dioxide," Wyss said.

        https://phys.org/news/2023-02-joule-technique-efficiently-would-be-pollution.html

        If they’re making graphene and hydrogen then there can’t be much left over can there?

    • The_Pete
      link
      fedilink
      English
      310 months ago

      So, the get 8% of the bottle into a usable form . . . by turning plastic bottles into gases. So where does the rest of the bottle go? How much energy is used for that?

      • Bernie EcclestonedOP
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Second paragraph…

        In this work, we converted waste plastics—including mixed waste plastics that don’t have to be sorted by type or washed—into high-yield hydrogen gas and high-value graphene