Sjmarf to [email protected] • 9 months agoSorry for the inconvenienceimagemessage-square65arrow-up1734arrow-down112
arrow-up1722arrow-down1imageSorry for the inconvenienceSjmarf to [email protected] • 9 months agomessage-square65
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•9 months agoRelevant username. That thing is nowhere near 2.5" dia.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•9 months agoI googled for 50 mm. That should be close enough.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•9 months ago2.5 inches is 635 mm. Thats much closer to 50 cm
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•9 months agoI am often incorrect. Today is one of those days
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•9 months agoThat doesn’t sound right to me. An inch has ~2.54 cm, so 2.5" should be 6.35 cm and a cm has 10mm, so that becomes 63.5mm
Relevant username.
That thing is nowhere near 2.5" dia.
I googled for 50 mm. That should be close enough.
Relevant username
2.5 inches is 635 mm. Thats much closer to 50 cm
1 inch is 25,4 mm, not 254 mm.
I am often incorrect. Today is one of those days
That doesn’t sound right to me. An inch has ~2.54 cm, so 2.5" should be 6.35 cm and a cm has 10mm, so that becomes 63.5mm
Lol, 2.5 inches is over 2 feet?