• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -261 year ago

    This article is about continuing funding Ukraine during a government shut down, not backing out entirely or never funding Ukraine in the first place.

    • partial_accumen
      link
      fedilink
      241 year ago

      You’re suggesting cutting funding to Ukraine. That conflict isn’t a Netflix subscription you can put on pause for a month so that you can make your car payment. Planning and logistics on that level takes months. Cutting off funding would have drastic consequences.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -221 year ago

        That’s a risk I’m willing to take. All the positive things you listed have already been accomplished anyway. Europe can clean up the crumbs without us.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          Ελληνικά
          13
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Glad you are willing to risk other peoples lives, family and freedom because of 5 shitbird Republicans who were going to vote no on any budget because their dear leader wants them to obstruct normal functions of government.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  Ελληνικά
                  11 year ago

                  Oh, well duh. Of course you have to pay into it, even if you don’t use it. I pay for roads I don’t drive on, police that don’t protect me, military jets I’ll never even be allowed to touch. I pay for the salaries of those dipshit Republicans who are holding this country hostage in order to undercut an investigation into the single most criminal presidency in our history. Don’t like it? Tough, grow the fuck up and quit whining out bullshit talking points from billionaires who are trying to shortchange the 99%.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -61 year ago

                    Social security doesn’t work that way. You are supposed to get out of it what you put in to it. But in reality it has a negative rate of return. It is worse than putting the cash under your mattress.

        • partial_accumen
          link
          fedilink
          111 year ago

          That’s a risk I’m willing to take.

          Clearly. You’ll join a long line of people before you making similar mistakes being “penny wise pound foolish”.

          Europe can clean up the crumbs without us.

          I’m concerned you aren’t even able to exhibit capacity for your own personal self interest. If you think that Europe could take that hit without drastic hits to the USA, you’re even more short sighted than I thought before. Those hits would drastically affect your daily life in the USA.

    • flipht
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      The government shutting down isn’t for a reason. It’s not a budgeting mechanism. It’s literally just Republicans, yet again, refusing to authorize payment for the programs they already authorized.

      They do this repeatedly and regularly to force additional concessions on programs they don’t like. It’s got nothing to do with money and everything to do with social control.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -201 year ago

        That’s such a strange DNC talking point, “Programs already authorized”. Program funding changes all the time.

        • flipht
          link
          fedilink
          121 year ago

          They created a budget. They allocated money to shit. They all voted and it got approved.

          Now they have to authorize payment of the thing they already said they’d pay for. It’s fucking asinine.

          Is that less of a talking point for you? They lie, cheat, and steal to get crap cut in the original budget negotiations, and then they refuse to pay the bill until democrats agree to ridiculous hostage demands.

    • athos77
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      The Republicans really want to leave Ukraine to Russia, they’re just waiting on the messaging to convert enough of their base to make it politically feasible to do so.