I’m speaking of online data harvested through apps, websites, hardware (such as phones/streaming devices).

I mean if multiple versions of the same harvested data are being sold, wouldn’t the value decrease because of the competition? When it comes to aggregate data, how much financial value can there really be in knowing that a million office workers just clicked on the same cat meme?

How does the quantity of time and expense toward “personalization” not simply overshadow the return, given that no one can click on even a small percentage of those numerous ads, let alone buy the shit being advertised?

It just seems like there would come a time when the value of user data is sucked dry, or at least significantly decreased.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    839 months ago

    Seeing how 90% of the ads I get are reeeeeally missing the boat, they might already be over- harvesting my data?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      359 months ago

      Exactly.

      Alternately, perhaps the algorithm knows me better than I know myself. Perhaps the humidifier I just bought is about to kick off a new hobby of collecting humidifiers. /s

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      89 months ago

      It’s getting weird. I’m suddenly seeing a lot of things pretending to not be ads but specifically referencing my age or things generally blanketed to my age group. But weird things like life insurance and dick pills. Stuff I’ve never searched before because I already have employer provided insurance and my shmegan works as intended.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        49 months ago

        Yeah I’ve got ads for very weird, retiree, conservative dad shirts a lot a while back, with text like “dad: I fix things and like cars” or something dumb like that.

        I’m in my thirties, European, super left, don’t like/never wil have kids. Wtf?

        (By the way algorithms those facts are just a present, see what you wanna do with it)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      59 months ago

      I’m still waiting for the spooky stuff I’ve been hearing about for years.

      I’m being tracked. My information sold and exchanged. Big, evil corporations trading my data with other companies like it was baseball cards. All my inner-most desires leaked!

      All to get an ad for a “litter box robot” or whatever when I’m browsing memes.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        29 months ago

        I did notice that one we talked about vacuum cleaners or something, we got some ads about that. Weird i guess. But 90% of the time with household stuff like that its: research something (and start getting ads), buy something and keep getting ads for another month. And companies are posting top dollar for those ad- companies and their algorithms???

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 months ago

      My ads think I’m an oncologist. I’ve been pretty good at obscuring my digital footprint but this latest bit is a little weird.

        • @[email protected]
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Continuing education mostly. Retreats, online courses, stuff like that.

          I’ve had a few major surgeries that are often used to treat cancer, and I to understand what I was getting myself into I basically had to put myself through an abbreviated online med school. Got actual med school syllabi, went through the relevant classes, read the textbooks, asked my doctors anything I didn’t understand and a few verification questions to make sure I was understanding the content properly. I basically know enough to be dangerous. Right around then I started getting a lot of ads for jobs in the medical field and I guess I tricked the algorithm into thinking I got a good one.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            29 months ago

            Ah lol, that makes sense actually. I guess the algorithm isn’t nuanced enough to pick out a case such as yours