A federal judge has struck down a California law banning gun magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. U.S.

California cannot ban gun owners from having detachable magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, a federal judge ruled Friday.

The decision from U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez won’t take effect immediately. California Attorney General Rob Bonta, a Democrat, has already filed a notice to appeal the ruling. The ban is likely to remain in effect while the case is still pending.

This is the second time Benitez has struck down California’s law banning certain types of magazines. The first time he struck it down — way back in 2017 — an appeals court ended up reversing his decision.

  • Bakkoda
    2018·
    1 year ago

    What a brilliantly uneducated idea. Thanks for turning my hunting season into a 3k dollar minimum adventure instead of a cheap way for me to put food on my table.

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.worldEnglish
        21·
        1 year ago

        We do during bow season, and then we hunt with rifles during rifle season. It’s the best way to get more deer meat in the freezer.

    • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
      921·
      1 year ago

      Oh fuck off. No one gives a flying fuck about your bloodlust beyond other psychos.

        • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
          39·
          1 year ago

          It literally is when we live in this day and age. If you aren’t living in a tribe somewhere, the bottom line is, you do this because you want to end something’s life.

          • Jeremy [Iowa]@midwest.socialEnglish
            74·
            1 year ago

            It literally is when we live in this day and age.

            I’ll be sure to inform my hunting friends we’re all full of bloodlust for our interest in filling the freezer with cheap, quality meat which also serves to provide population control for an invasive and damaging species because a rando on the Internet said so.

            I feel for you and your apparent limited ability to consider other situations.