• TheOneCurly
    link
    fedilink
    English
    299 months ago

    I would think manned missions would be slightly less prone to this type of issue. Having a person with a brain and hands next to the machinery means that minor issues that are impossible to solve from millions of miles away become trivial (ie. a connector comes loose: just put it back in, dust on the solar panel: wipe it off). It has its own set of dangers of course, but autonomous rover issues don’t necessarily translate 1:1 with manned missions.

    • 567PrimeMover
      link
      fedilink
      79 months ago

      Makes me think of that one mission (I think it was to Venus?) Where the camera’s lens cap happened to land so that it obstructed a soil probe. So many dumb things like that that can just totally screw up an unmanned mission

    • chaogomu
      link
      fedilink
      49 months ago

      The issue with a manned mission to the moon is still going to be dust. Moon dust is sharp and jagged due to the complete lack of weathering.

      It was actually a huge problem for the Apollo missions.

      One of the major hurdles of figuring out how to do a longer lunar mission is figuring out how to handle the dust. It can completely compromise the joints and seals of a standard space suit in about a dozen hours.