• @Thief_of_Crows
    link
    English
    49 months ago

    I was trying to give him the benefit of the doubt actually. You’re the one saying he isn’t merely the victim of propaganda. Its entirely possible he was just an idiot. Or a massive piece of shit. Most of the people who were “driven out” of communist countries were just business owners who were trying to hoard all the food they grew, during a famine. So yes, now that you bring it up, it is also possible your grandfather was just a massive POS, rather than a victim.

    • YeetPics
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Hahaha sure dude. Whatever you say. I’m sure you know much more about the trials and tribulations that happened before you were born than the people who lived through it.

      I’m super happy to be living in this country after having read about my ancestors experiences. He took a risk by coming here, but we all have benefitted from it.

      You’re still a fucking tool, though. 🤡

      • @Thief_of_Crows
        link
        English
        09 months ago

        Yeah, that kind of thing can happen when you actually research history rather than ask one person. There’s a reason anecdotal evidence isn’t given much credence.

        • YeetPics
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19 months ago

          So my options in this scenario:

          1. read a first hand account from my ancestor and parse out any personal feelings that cloud the truth

          2. read an opinion from a nameless stranger online who has done nothing but doubt what I have read with my own eyes

          As you can see here, the ‘anecdotal evidence’ is coming from you, and the historical truth that actually existed is documented in this journal.

          Get your head out of your ass.

          • @Thief_of_Crows
            link
            English
            -19 months ago

            Why are those your only options? You already ruled out researching what the actual truth is? Don’t take my word for it, prove me wrong. If I can be proven wrong, I want to know. My evidence is empirical, but 2nd hand. Better than anecdotal, but not proof in itself. Your grandfather’s journal is primary, but anecdotal. Would you rather be right, or be correct? I’d rather be correct.

            • YeetPics
              link
              fedilink
              English
              19 months ago

              I have a first hand account written by a person who I trust.

              You can fuck off with your 2nd hand bullshit.

              You are wrong, misled and propagandized.

              You are a fool.

              • @Thief_of_Crows
                link
                English
                19 months ago

                Oh, my research into the matter was propaganda? Is all of the rest of the actual data propaganda too? You have anecdotal evidence, which I have no doubt your grandfather believed was true, but which does not necessarily mean it is correct. The fact is that the vast majority of those who fled the USSR citing persecution had very much done something worthy of persecution. Most commonly, withholding the means of production from their workers.

                If I am wrong though, show me the proof. Anecdotal evidence is useful for verifying knowledge, and for creating hypotheses. For proof though, actual data is required.