Girlparts to [email protected] • 1 year ago"Debris field" found near Titanic in search for missing sub, U.S. Coast Guard sayswww.cbsnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square192fedilinkarrow-up1250arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1250arrow-down1external-link"Debris field" found near Titanic in search for missing sub, U.S. Coast Guard sayswww.cbsnews.comGirlparts to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square192fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareHeartyBeastlinkfedilink1•1 year agoWell - how about out if the receiver is on the the hull - and the bluetooth signals don’t have to travel through any water?
minus-squarePabloDiscobarlinkfedilink1•1 year agoMaybe. And? Don’t overthink it, I’m answering to someone who boldly claimed: “OK. Explain why they would have more trouble working at that depth” and who is long gone btw.
minus-squarePabloDiscobarlinkfedilink1•1 year agoWell, I gave you a reason why it would cause problem, if the device piloted was out, in the water. Do you have a schematic of the sub? I don’t.
minus-squareHeartyBeastlinkfedilink1•1 year ago Do you have a schematic of the sub? I don’t. You were the one who called the decision to use Bluetooth “Delusional”. I’m the one who said we have no idea whether it was a good idea or not - so I think we can leave it here.
Well - how about out if the receiver is on the the hull - and the bluetooth signals don’t have to travel through any water?
Maybe. And? Don’t overthink it, I’m answering to someone who boldly claimed:
“OK. Explain why they would have more trouble working at that depth”
and who is long gone btw.
You were replying to me. I’m still here.
Well, I gave you a reason why it would cause problem, if the device piloted was out, in the water.
Do you have a schematic of the sub? I don’t.
You were the one who called the decision to use Bluetooth “Delusional”. I’m the one who said we have no idea whether it was a good idea or not - so I think we can leave it here.