• @sugar_in_your_tea
      link
      English
      39 months ago

      I don’t see what that has to do with Steam, digital goods are regulated differently than physical goods.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 months ago

        digital goods are regulated differently than physical goods.

        But this is still about activation keys which are frequently printed out, put in a plastic case, and then sent to retail markets.

        • @sugar_in_your_tea
          link
          English
          19 months ago

          That sounds like a separate thing entirely. I could be wrong, but I don’t think Valve has any say in how keys not sold through the Steam storefront are resold, so supposedly the lawsuit should target whoever is distributing keys in that way. AFAIK, Steam only offers two ways to buy a game–buy the game for yourself and buy as a gift–and in neither case does Steam offer the keys directly to users.

          And then there’s this from the article:

          In a statement back in 2021, Valve said that the charges didn’t pertain to PC games sold on Steam, but that it was accused of locking keys to particular territories at the request of publishers. It added that it turned off region locks for most cases (other than local laws) in 2015 because of the EU’s concerns.

          So AFAIK Valve isn’t distributing resellable keys that are region locked, it’s region-locking at the point of purchase and allowing developers to request region-locked keys. So it would be on publishers to abide by EU laws, no?

          The again, I don’t live in the EU, nor have I ever bought a physical Steam key (not sure if Valve directly offers that in any way).

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            29 months ago

            So it would be on publishers to abide by EU laws, no?

            Yes. Bandai Namco, Capcom, Focus Home, Koch Media, and ZeniMax are named by the ruling. Never heard of Focus Home before, though.