• DopamineDaydreams
    link
    fedilink
    99 months ago

    The same was said about the steam controller, but in the end it was still shit compared to a mouse. It’s just not feasible in a game as competitive as csgo.

    • @azvasKvklenko
      link
      English
      89 months ago

      It’s not for everyone, but calling it shit just because it doesn’t work easily for your liking is
      a bit much since it’s still usable to some. I beat plethora of shooters on gyro and it wasn’t that much harder than playing on mouse once I got used to it.

      • forgotaboutlaye
        link
        fedilink
        29 months ago

        Controllers in general are also extremely accessible, and expandable for those that might struggle using a tradtional mouse and keyboard.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      49 months ago

      CS:GO is dead, though, and neither of the popular and beloved entries to the series was ever solely focused on the competitive scene - the community and the casual fun also matter in the world of Counter-Strike, and that’s one of its parts that can be enjoyed on a controller just fine. Of course I don’t expect to be able to perform just as well or better than the M+K players when playing on a controller, regardless of its gyro capabilities, especially in the competitive modes. Counter-Strike is just much more than just a competitive game.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -2
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Eh, people always say this yet data shows it’s not true. Many competitive games have had controller vs m+k and found no discernible advantage. Halo for one, gears of war is another I remember.

      I play with an elite controller and I have had zero problem winning and going mvp against m+k players in any game I’ve played. I play PUBG where m+k use is rampant and I still maintain a 30-40% win rate in squads, often in 2 man squads.