• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    469 months ago

    The body that was found was of another missing person, but he didn’t have the strength to create the sign, or the tools to do so.

    Meaning at least one unknown person came to grief in that area.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      489 months ago

      It had to have been him, it’s too coincidental otherwise. They believed it possible until they checked his remains and said he was too weak but he may not have always been, he could have died months after making the sign too

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        219 months ago

        This was my thought too. Plus they thought the remains were female for quite some time. Not sure I entirely trust Japan’s forensic abilities at the time.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          99 months ago

          it is actually fairly difficult to determine sex based off of just bones. there’s a considerable overlap in any dimension one might use to decide

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            109 months ago

            Believe it or not, it is assuming the pelvis is present, it is very easy to determine sex. Just look at the pubic arch, just inferior (below) the pubic symphysis. Narrow (less than 90 degrees) is male wide (more than 90 degrees) is female. There are a few other details like the shape of the iliac crest and the size of the pubic cavity but the pubic arch is the simplest.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            89 months ago

            Maybe the tool just wasn’t found? The area was described as a kind of trap that is difficult to get out of. So where could this other person have gone?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 months ago

        These are fully grown trees we’re talking about, he had no tools to cut them down with, or the strength to move them.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          89 months ago

          It seems more likely, given all the gear he did have, that there is a tool lost somewhere in the area.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              29 months ago

              Well it seems more likely, given it is an enclosed area that has been searched at this point that there isn’t another missing body but rather one of the bodies had a tool that is now missing.

              I don’t think it means he had an axe I think it is very clear he had carrying capacity and planned his trip and so it is more likely to me that we haven’t found what enabled him to do it rather than we haven’t found who did it.