Some argue that bots should be entitled to ingest any content they see, because people can.

Some argue that bots should be entitled to ingest any content they see, because people can.

  • @hoshikarakitaridia
    1•9 months ago

    You are asking a lot of good questions. And the truth is, none of these have good answers.

    Should an AI be able to look at everything a human can?

    Can an AI replicate a book in it’s original expression, throwing up arguments about copyright?

    What is the difference between humans and AIs?

    There are only 2 universal truths to these questions: it’s complicated, and it depends.

    As humans, we can the law to be pro-human and facilitate human creativity.

    Human creativity is complex and there are no studies that this directly facilitates human creativity.

    But more importantly, should we do what you said? There’s a good reason there’s discussions about it, because not everyone agrees with you. And we should solve the ethical problems first before we come to the laws. Because we can’t base ethics on laws, and laws on instinct.