Questioning witnesses in the first impeachment hearing staged by House Republicans, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez prompted each to say they were not presenting “firsthand witness accounts” of crimes committed by Joe Biden.

The New York Democrat also accused Republicans of fabricating supposed evidence of corruption involving the president and his surviving son, Hunter Biden.

Republicans on the House oversight committee called three witnesses, Democrats one.

    • @yata
      link
      459 months ago

      They would be a joke if they weren’t such a serious threat.

    • metaStatic
      link
      fedilink
      15
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      at this point

      oh man where have you been for the past … checks notes … 169 years

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        189 months ago

        Nah. Lincoln was the republican president 169 years ago. Also Teddy Roosevelt was pretty cool. Trust busting and all.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            15
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            For almost a century of the 169 years posted, Republicans were the more progressive of the two parties.

            The parties did not align as-is until the Civil Rights Act was passed and the racists left the Democrats as a result.

            Democrats during the Hoover era were famously corrupt, for instance, and them refusing to work with Hoover to prevent his re-election almost certainly worsened the Great Depression.

            It’s important to remember that the parties were originally both coalitions - that’s why the same Republicans who are racist as fuck today still call the Dems the “party of slavery” - it’s bullshit and the smart ones know it, but most people don’t understand the history.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -69 months ago

              I did not say the Democratic party was any better at any point either. They’re shades of shit one at times more “progressive” than the other.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                4
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                This isn’t a “both sides” thing for me, just clarifying the history of the parties.

                Currently, and basically since the CRA, there is clear superiority of one side.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  09 months ago

                  It’s not both sides for me either boss. Pointing out that the system itself is flawed not simply a party or the parties but the system itself.

                  Take for instance Lincoln’s proclivity for hanging native Americans and pardoning people that murdered natives. Ie. Progress is a relative term.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    19 months ago

                    I mean the Native Americans in this instance did murder a bunch of people.

                    We can argue the morality of that (I tend to just default to agreeing with them), but the legality was not up for debate.