• abraxas
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Could you quantify “riddled with bugs that need to be fixed by modders” regarding Starfield?

    Every complaint I’ve seen so far has involved bullets, physics, or the AI. In my own experience, I’ve seen exactly 1 bug (the outpost-won’t-respond bug) and it only hit me once and was easy to fix.

    My first issue with Elden Ring was crash-bugs and screen-stutter. It didn’t like my monitor streaming (all my other games were fine, including games using raytracing). And crashing every couple hours sucked. I haven’t had one Starfield crash yet.

    Also, have you ever ridden torrent across the sky? I have.

    I don’t claim my experience is everything, but I’ve seen far more bugs in Elden Ring than in Starfield.

    • Kecessa
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not talking about a game specifically, I’m talking about the way the studio works in general.

      If you go back to the comment chain the original complaint is about a lack of quality control (releases full of bugs, missing features, bad UI, bad optimization), the other complaint is about a design choice (the game is hard because the devs intentionally made it so). My point is that it’s two different things and saying “Your complaint about Bethesda’s game is the same as complaining about Fromsoft not including a difficulty setting.” is a false equivalency.

      • abraxas
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The major complaints people have about Elden Ring are endemic in every Fromsoft game. Janky controls, Rhythm-Game fighting with terrible balance, QOL features that are missing not only out of negligence, but out of design.

        And except a couple “releases full of bugs”, I don’t really agree with those criticisms. You can find people who hate the featureset or UI of most games, and their optimization hasn’t particularly been terrible.