@[email protected] to [email protected] • 9 months agoreverse Indydiscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up11.22Karrow-down117
arrow-up11.2Karrow-down1imagereverse Indydiscuss.tchncs.de@[email protected] to [email protected] • 9 months agomessage-square45fedilink
minus-squareHot SaucermanlinkfedilinkEnglish62•edit-29 months agoI think you’re missing their point. Indy was always “it belongs in a museum” when its an intricate part of some foreign nations history. That museum always seemed to be British or US. The point being they’re just stealing their history back. A reverse Indy. “It belongs to the culture it came from. Allow them to choose what to do with it. Perhaps they even have their own museums.”
I think you’re missing their point.
Indy was always “it belongs in a museum” when its an intricate part of some foreign nations history. That museum always seemed to be British or US.
The point being they’re just stealing their history back. A reverse Indy.
“It belongs to the culture it came from. Allow them to choose what to do with it. Perhaps they even have their own museums.”
Very well put.