Yes we do

  • WindowsEnjoyer
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    This looks literally what I’d like the future to be. Everyone can live the way they want. <3

      • WindowsEnjoyer
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well, some people prefer dogs, some prefer cats and some prefer sheeps… 😅

        • Sethayy
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah but can sheep really consent, without a massive power dynamic

          • genuineparts@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I really don’t want to be arguing a pro-bestiality point here and I have no clue how one would go about the act. But I think a sheep would be able to hurt you pretty good if it wasn’t okay with what is happening, same as a horse for example.

            • Grapetruth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Hence why veganism is a moral obligation to animals. It’s indefensible to kill or exploit/harm an animal without their consent (which they can’t give), and which clearly isn’t in their best interests

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                it makes no sense to discuss consent from non-human animals. do you ask plans for consent before cutting them? or doors for consent before opening them and putting your whole body through them?

              • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s a stupid argument, just by having sentience doesn’t mean we have any moral obligations to our food sources. There are plenty of incentives to human being’s health and society by reducing meat consumption, why would you choose such a weak reason instead?

      • Grapetruth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s an oof because it shows, yes, we could live happily coexisting with animals without unnecessarily exploiting, enslaving, abusing and killing them for commodities and entertainment, which we have alternatives for. The future is vegan/plant-based and animal rights are respected in a progressive world.