Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s trip to Beijing is a ripple on the tide of President Joe Biden’s decisions not to promote dialogue or expert understanding. It has not interrupted the slid…
Should really take your own advice. Russia is the same kind of an oligarchy as western “democracies”. You’re probably so uneducated that you think US is a democracy. 😂
Nah, I’m using the word chauvinist entirely properly. A chauvinist is someon who has excessive or prejudiced support for one’s own cause or group. That’s you right there buddy.
I understand your inclination to run away from the actual topic of conversation by yelping inappropriate slurs, but you’re still wrong, no matter how hard you try to avoid the conversation or change topics.
Aw, you’re taking my posts on American oligarchy to inform your opinions? While changing the subject again lends no credibility to your original mistake, I will take this as a compliment and accept your concession, thanks.
I am proud of you for googling the definition to chauvinist. Now that you’ve done that, you should be able to figure out that it does not fit me at all. You’re trying to avoid responsibility for your own inaccuracies.
You might want to move on from the soapbox in your head, try these things that I did, approving you wrong through the incorrect language you used, objective evidence, popular consensus. These are all work very well to prove you wrong and obviously are more convincing than muttering untrue epithets in your head.
Should really take your own advice. Russia is the same kind of an oligarchy as western “democracies”. You’re probably so uneducated that you think US is a democracy. 😂
Nah, I’m using the word chauvinist entirely properly. A chauvinist is someon who has excessive or prejudiced support for one’s own cause or group. That’s you right there buddy.
I understand your inclination to run away from the actual topic of conversation by yelping inappropriate slurs, but you’re still wrong, no matter how hard you try to avoid the conversation or change topics.
Aw, you’re taking my posts on American oligarchy to inform your opinions? While changing the subject again lends no credibility to your original mistake, I will take this as a compliment and accept your concession, thanks.
I am proud of you for googling the definition to chauvinist. Now that you’ve done that, you should be able to figure out that it does not fit me at all. You’re trying to avoid responsibility for your own inaccuracies.
You could’ve done literally anything else, and yet you took the time to write that comment. 😂
I like exposing liars and trolls. Eating up your tears.
that’s an interesting way to say that you’re trolling and can’t even make a coherent argument
It’s a very clear way of saying that every time I see you promoting harmful ideologies, I’ll prove you wrong.
Yes, I’m sure you prove a lot of people wrong in your head.
You might want to move on from the soapbox in your head, try these things that I did, approving you wrong through the incorrect language you used, objective evidence, popular consensus. These are all work very well to prove you wrong and obviously are more convincing than muttering untrue epithets in your head.
All you’ve done was repeat baseless claims over and over like a broken record. Evidently that’s what passes for making an argument in your head.