• 1simpletailer@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is incorrect. Luxury Gay Space Communism came first. It was embraced widely after the discovery of intelligent alien life united Humanity. The Replicator only became wide-spread in the time between The Original Series and The Next Generation. Even then there were other cultures with access to replicators that weren’t “Communist” such as the Ferengi and Cardassians. Equality has to be valued for a society to be truly post-scarcity.

    • snugglesthefalse
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which is why I’d like fully automated luxury gay space communism. We can’t be trusted to govern ourselves, take me to The Culture now please.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I, Robot did it first.

        Man straight up said “robots would make the best leaders because they can be made to be honest, rational, and selfless,” and people just remember the stories about the malfunctions.

        • snugglesthefalse
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The biggest problem would be making sure that the robots are acting in our best interests in a sustainable way and that no bad actors or loopholes make their way in. Though that’s the topic of decades of speculation so I’m hardly bringing anything new up, yeah. And as you’ve said, I robot covered a lot of these things way back in the earlier sci-fi days.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Joining an already-existing galactic civilization also results in a post-scarcity world, especially after the depopulation of the planet, but yes I already confessed I am not a Trekkie.

      Regardless, communism, like Star Trek, is a fun fancy that won’t ever happen.

      • Not_Alec_Baldwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        People that are blindly anti-capitalism and pro something else (usually social/communism) tend to justify their feelings by saying that all of human weakness (greed, corruption, laziness) are the fault of capitalism.

        People that are blindly pro-capitalism tend to blame all the failures of capitalism on regulation.

        Really, all the failures of all our systems seem to be that humans are greedy, selfish creatures. And regulation is the (only?) thing that governs human weaknesses.

        MAYBE, if we manage to generate a post-scarcity world, we’ll be able to manage that greed problem. I definitely experience feelings of kindness and generosity with my friends, family, or in times/places where I’m not stressed/rushed/feeling scarcity.

        But I don’t know how pathetic, greedy humans ever generate a post scarcity world.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          People that are blindly pro-capitalism tend to blame all the failures of capitalism on regulation.

          I’m “blindly pro-capitalism” and I blame it on perverse incentives and unaddressed externalities.