Maps and documents recovered from the bodies of Hamas attackers reveal a coordinated plan to target children and take hostages inside an Israeli village near Gaza.

  • @idkwhatimdoing
    link
    1
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The narrative is confirmed by the videos and evidence, not by the documents. I don’t really understand your argument.

    • queermunist she/her
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Videos and evidence can be arranged and presented in a way to create a narrative. That doesn’t make the narrative true.

      Give me enough footage and evidence and I can “prove” Bush did 9/11. I just need to discard or downplay all the footage and evidence that is inconvenient, and overemphasize the footage and evidence that supports my narrative.

      • @idkwhatimdoing
        link
        19 months ago

        This isn’t about proving a conspiracy or particular people’s involvement, though. It’s about what happened on the ground. Who was killed, by whom, where? Those are facts, independent of interpretation or agenda. The nature of the documents can be disputed, but the content of them sorta can’t be, given that it’s just what happened.

        It’s the difference between gathering videos to suggest it was Bush vs gathering videos to just show that, yes, the twin towers were hit. One is subject to both record and agenda, and the other is just historical record.

        • queermunist she/her
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          A lot of the “facts” turn out to be unsubstantiated, like the ‘40 beheaded babies’ story. We absolutely don’t have the facts.

          • @idkwhatimdoing
            link
            19 months ago

            Reuters and AP just confirmed a number of those videos, btw.

            • queermunist she/her
              link
              fedilink
              09 months ago

              I didn’t say all the facts were unsubstantiated?

              It’s like this: make some fake documents that match the known facts, and then in those documents include fake evidence to support “facts” that push an agenda.

              A document says “go to house A, take hostage, burn it down, eat the baby”. We know they went to the house, took a hostage, and burned it down. No baby was found, but the document says the baby was eaten so clearly it must have happened because the document is true.

              • @idkwhatimdoing
                link
                19 months ago

                That’s not what’s happening here. There are bodies and videos to verify what happened.

                • queermunist she/her
                  link
                  fedilink
                  19 months ago

                  You can not know if the bodies and videos verify everything in those documents! There are doubtlessly things included in those documents that we wouldn’t otherwise think we knew without seeing them - which means the documents become the only evidence.

                  • @idkwhatimdoing
                    link
                    19 months ago

                    The only things taken from these documents are the plan to take hostages and kill civilians in a school and kibbutz compound, with the awareness that many of those civilians would be children. There’s no extrapolation there and that exact thing happened.