• @JasSmith
    link
    19 months ago

    Tax revenues increased after those tax cuts. It will help to read about the Laffer curve. There is a kind if elasticity of demand for tax revenue. When raising taxes, some proportion of economic activity, including people working, is reduced. This can lead to a net decrease in tax revenue. The opposite is also true. The Laffer curve stipulates that there is an optimal tax efficiency on the vertex.

    Of course this has nothing to do with fair distribution. It simply means that, paradoxically, higher taxes would reduce the size of the federal budget.

      • @JasSmith
        link
        1
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Even if it results in less tax revenue, and poor people becoming even poorer? I don’t agree. I think we should help poor people, not hurt them.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          P.L. 115-97 permanently reduced the 35% CIT rate on ECI to a 21% flat rate for tax years beginning after 31 December 2017.

          https://www.pgpf.org/blog/2023/04/six-charts-that-show-how-low-corporate-tax-revenues-are-in-the-united-states-right-now

          We changed the corporate tax rate in 2017 and 2014 and have been collecting less and less taxes. Since corporations l are people, and they make the most amount of taxable income, we should be charging them more! They use public services such as roads and cause more pollution etc we should not be subsidizing their use.

          • @JasSmith
            link
            19 months ago

            We changed the corporate tax rate in 2017 and 2014 and have been collecting less and less taxes.

            As I explained above, this is not correct. In fact, the opposite is true. Tax revenue continues to trend up. They did not not decrease after 2014 or 2017.