• FARTYSHARTBLASTOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah. but if you’re doing it anyways for exercise, might as well use the energy.

    • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ehh, not necessarily. Would you even recoup the energy and materials needed for such a bike? Would be a bit different if the energy was stored in something other than a battery.

      • sizzler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re already going to have the exercise bike if that’s what you want so now we are only recouping the generator and parts. Why do you hate progress?

        • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Because if you can’t recoup the energy cost then it’s just more waste. I’m just saying it’s not straightforward.