• @Kecessa
    link
    28 months ago

    I’ve got similar ideas!

    One to four units can only be privately owned, 5 to 8 units can only be owned by a registered company, more than that must be run as a non profit (ideally a state corporation).

    People are only allowed to own one property in a 50km radius (meaning that if you own a 4 unit you pretty much have to live in it unless you live in the next city over).

      • @Kecessa
        link
        18 months ago

        If it’s rental then it’s non profit, they can convert them to condos if they don’t agree.

          • @Kecessa
            link
            1
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Well they can, it just means that the building management needs to show that all the money they get gets reinvested in the building or put aside for repairs. Non profits are much easier to investigate than private companies because they need to be able to justify everything they spend so they don’t overcharge. If it’s a state corporation? Even better, profits get sent to the government coffers to spend on services and you’re sure that the charges are lowered the next year. That’s how our health protection works for anything related to roads where I live and there’s a pretty good reason why it’s the province where it’s the cheapest to insure a vehicle!

              • @Kecessa
                link
                18 months ago

                Implying that the salary of the people currently owning rental units isn’t very high…

                  • @Kecessa
                    link
                    1
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    I’m not the one who’s against alternatives for reasons that apply even more to the status quo, at least I’m proposing a solution and even mentioned that it’s even better to have it under a state corporation 🤷