Privacy advocate challenges YouTube’s ad blocking detection::Irish eyes may not be smiling

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -258 months ago

    Media hosting is not “arbitrary code” and costs money. Just saying don’t be surprised when a site prevents you from using a service without paying for it in some way.

    • @long_chicken_boat
      link
      English
      248 months ago

      they detect adblock by executing proprietary JavaScript code in my browser, using my CPU cycles. I paid for that CPU and I can choose what code gets executed and what not.

      That JavaScript code is also privacy invasive and I’m not letting a mega corporation recollect information about myself. So yeah, I’ll block whatever I want from my browser. And if that makes Google loose money, they are more than welcomed to look for a business model other than advertising.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -258 months ago

        That JavaScript code is also privacy invasive

        As a web developer seeing an end user say this is hilarious. Hate to break it you but there are much better ways to track you.

        If you’re that paranoid just use a VPN and never enter personal information on the internet.

        • @long_chicken_boat
          link
          English
          158 months ago

          I prefer to use Tor, but whatever makes you happy.

          Client side code isn’t the only way to track someone, but it’s one of the options. And fingerprinting browsers using JavaScript is an extended practice.

          Anyway, you’re missing my point. My browser, my rules. I’ll just block any script that annoys me.

        • @rebelsimile
          link
          English
          88 months ago

          Hate to break it you but there are much better ways to track you.

          —What’s that? Oh. The producers are telling me they use those methods too.