How is this even remotely related to the OP, or this comm at large?
If by “pro-defederation safe space bigots” you mean instances like lemmy.blahaj.zone and beehaw.org, that tend to defed a lot of instances to keep their own as “safe spaces”, can you please explain what would make them “bigots”? And if you meant something else, could you clarify it?
They probably mean Hexbear, which is a safe space for authoritarians and transphobes not to be called transphobic. I’ve documented their transphobic, homophobic, and ableist harassment at [email protected]
It’s still weird though. Like, let’s suppose that the poster was indeed referring to Hexbear, and that Hexbear was indeed “a safe space for authoritarians and transphobes” (I’m not digging on this further, as it isn’t necessary for the sake of the argument). It’s still randomly associating “being pro-defederation” with orthogonal matters, like the alleged bigotry. (Plus they’re usually the ones being defederated, not the ones defederating.)
Well sure. A bigot cannot tolerate the free exchange of ideas. If bigots don’t have a safe space to be bigots, then someone may come along and call them a transphobe and hurt their feelings. Authoritarian powers have always found excuses to shut down the speech of progressive radicals. Protest cannot be tolerated. They will use words like “brigading”, and “wrecker”, and “harassment” to construct a worldview in which political speech is a moral wrong, and they will enforce that worldview. I’ve seen this behaviour from both Blahaj and Hexbear. And I’ve seen it from my own government used against all kinds of progressive protesters. It’s universal.
This reasoning breaks for Hexbear, since it blocks exactly four instances: Threads, Burggit, Exploding Heads, and LW. As such, if Hexbear is a “bigot instance”, bigotry doesn’t lead to being “pro-defed”. As such, the other user was soapboxing against instances defederating others. (And if it is not a bigot instance, then it is not an example for that at all.)
[I’ll probably not talk about this further ITT because I need to “chew” a bit on what you said, and I don’t want to be an assumer. I’ll still read anything that you might reply in this regard.]
You’re right. That other person was probably talking about Blahaj and their reactionary political position of pretending anything can be apolitical. Also, doxxing trans people.
I consider Hexbear to be the same pattern in a different colour. Instead of defederating, they just ban any leftist or trans person who they’ve chosen to harass today. I consider defederations and bans to be two means of accomplishing the same goal, so I wasn’t keeping the distinction in mind.
As such, I’m creating an exception to the way that I usually moderate this community, and banning you before you cause problems here. You aren’t fooling anyone here.
deleted by creator
How is this even remotely related to the OP, or this comm at large?
If by “pro-defederation safe space bigots” you mean instances like lemmy.blahaj.zone and beehaw.org, that tend to defed a lot of instances to keep their own as “safe spaces”, can you please explain what would make them “bigots”? And if you meant something else, could you clarify it?
They probably mean Hexbear, which is a safe space for authoritarians and transphobes not to be called transphobic. I’ve documented their transphobic, homophobic, and ableist harassment at [email protected]
Blahaj is also reactionary though: https://lemm.ee/post/12879395
Thank you for the clarification.
It’s still weird though. Like, let’s suppose that the poster was indeed referring to Hexbear, and that Hexbear was indeed “a safe space for authoritarians and transphobes” (I’m not digging on this further, as it isn’t necessary for the sake of the argument). It’s still randomly associating “being pro-defederation” with orthogonal matters, like the alleged bigotry. (Plus they’re usually the ones being defederated, not the ones defederating.)
Well sure. A bigot cannot tolerate the free exchange of ideas. If bigots don’t have a safe space to be bigots, then someone may come along and call them a transphobe and hurt their feelings. Authoritarian powers have always found excuses to shut down the speech of progressive radicals. Protest cannot be tolerated. They will use words like “brigading”, and “wrecker”, and “harassment” to construct a worldview in which political speech is a moral wrong, and they will enforce that worldview. I’ve seen this behaviour from both Blahaj and Hexbear. And I’ve seen it from my own government used against all kinds of progressive protesters. It’s universal.
This reasoning breaks for Hexbear, since it blocks exactly four instances: Threads, Burggit, Exploding Heads, and LW. As such, if Hexbear is a “bigot instance”, bigotry doesn’t lead to being “pro-defed”. As such, the other user was soapboxing against instances defederating others. (And if it is not a bigot instance, then it is not an example for that at all.)
[I’ll probably not talk about this further ITT because I need to “chew” a bit on what you said, and I don’t want to be an assumer. I’ll still read anything that you might reply in this regard.]
You’re right. That other person was probably talking about Blahaj and their reactionary political position of pretending anything can be apolitical. Also, doxxing trans people.
I consider Hexbear to be the same pattern in a different colour. Instead of defederating, they just ban any leftist or trans person who they’ve chosen to harass today. I consider defederations and bans to be two means of accomplishing the same goal, so I wasn’t keeping the distinction in mind.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Actually… you don’t need to answer the questions.
After checking your profile, it shows multiple instances of problematic behaviour: witch hunting here and here, misusing the word “bigot” for ad hitlerem, anti-vaxx content, even concern trolling against trans people. And your soapbox above shows that you’re likely going to behave like this in SNOOcalypse too.
As such, I’m creating an exception to the way that I usually moderate this community, and banning you before you cause problems here. You aren’t fooling anyone here.
Please, answer the questions.