Lately I see a lot of calls do have specific instances defederated for a particular subset of reasons:

  • Don’t like their content
  • Dont like their political leaning
  • Dont like their free speech approach
  • General feeling of being offended
  • I want a safe space!
  • This instance if hurting vulnerable people

I personally find each and every one of these arguments invalid. Everybody has the right to live in an echo chamber, but mandating it for everyone else is something that goes a bit too far.

Has humanity really developed into a situation where words and thoughts are more hurtful than sticks and stones?

Edit: Original context https://slrpnk.net/post/554148

Controversial topic, feel free to discuss!

  • @Lovstuhagen_EH
    link
    English
    21 year ago

    That sounds like a contradiction in terms. Unless you banned the only Nazi in existence it stands to reason there are likely to be others.

    It’s a tiny instance - yes, there has been an influx of new people, but it’s still absolutely nothing like it is here. If there are any, they are lurkers.

    But we know for a fact that fascists do not argue in good faith

    There are those who self-identify as progressives, anti-racists, feminists, anarchists, etc., who also do not argue in good faith and even use these progressive monikers to go as a sheep in wolves clothing…

    Point being: you have to argue in good faith, and not worry so much about assessing what other people think or are trying to do.

    But if your actual position really is as simplistic as

    -> this guy is a Republican -> he’s a smooth talking Republican -> he’s a secret racist -> he’s a cryptofascist -> everything he says is a lie meant to advance his fascist agenda…

    It’s actually you who is not engaging in good faith with anybody.

    • @steakmeoutt
      link
      English
      -11 year ago

      How incredibly telling that you leapt from Nazi to American Republican.