• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -31 year ago

    There’s nothing saying rent has to cover the owner’s expenses.

    If no one rents a home, the owner must either: leave the home empty, or lower the rent. Either way, if the home loses money, a rational investor has to sell. Enough people selling causes prices to drop.

    I guess what I’m saying is that taxing people who own multiple properties extra is a really weird fix.

    Wouldn’t building more homes be a better long term solution?

    • @sbv
      link
      71 year ago

      If no one rents a home, the owner must either: leave the home empty, or lower the rent. Either way, if the home loses money, a rational investor has to sell.

      Doesn’t the investor get to list the loss as a tax write-off?

      The investor can always wait. There’s a housing crisis, so people need somewhere to live.

      Wouldn’t building more homes be a better long term solution?

      We need to do both. Addressing the issue from the supply side and demand side makes sense.

      • @PizzasDontWearCapes
        link
        21 year ago

        Write-offs are only applicable if some other part of the business is making money

        If the entire business is owning a few properties and they are all in the red, there’s nothing to write off against

        • @sbv
          link
          21 year ago

          For small-scale landlords the loss would count against their regular income. For professional landlords, they probably have other properties.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        Doesn’t the investor get to list the loss as a tax write-off?

        I’m not 100% certain on the details, but yes. A landlord can reduce their taxes on other income but that doesn’t mean they aren’t still losing money.

        The investor can always wait.

        That’s only true if the expected increase in value covers the cost in carrying the property. If property values don’t increase dramatically over time, waiting just loses money.

        There’s a housing crisis, so people need somewhere to live.

        Exactly what I’m saying. Demand is, for the most part, inelastic. Each person requires some amount of space. Owning multiple properties that are occupied satisfies housing demand as much as each person owning their own home. As far as I figure, only vacant homes artificially inflate home prices/rent.

        I don’t mean to say that people should be stuck renting forever. Everyone should have the opportunity to own their home.

        • @sbv
          link
          31 year ago

          Owning multiple properties that are occupied satisfies housing demand as much as each person owning their own home. As far as I figure, only vacant homes artificially inflate home prices/rent.

          As we said above, the renter has to cover the costs of the property, plus the landlord’s profit.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            That’s just not how rent works. Tenants don’t care what the landlord’s expenses are. If a home is priced above what people are willing to pay, it’ll sit empty.