• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Now you are shifting the goalposts. I am not asserting that no one would take note of how someone may acquire one skill compared to another.

    Again, skills are different, not greater or lesser.

    • @Saledovil
      link
      18 months ago

      Again, skills are different, not greater or lesser.

      That’s what’s called an axiom, because it’s a statement that can’t really be argued. To disprove it, a valuation of skills would need to be imposed, and any valuation could just as easily be rejected, or turn out to be useless. And I do agree with your axiom.

      So, my question is, what conclusions do you derive from the axiom?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        08 months ago

        Any valuation that is imposed is simply one imposed, not natural, and neither is any value derived from it essential as an attribute of that which is being appraised.

        • @Saledovil
          link
          18 months ago

          Okay, what other conclusions do you derive from the axiom?

            • @Saledovil
              link
              18 months ago

              So, what conclusions do you draw from the negation of the assertion?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                08 months ago

                An assertion was given. I simply negated it.

                Anyone is free to draw any conclusion, or none.