BarterClubM to [email protected]English • 8 months agoFry cooksi.imgur.comimagemessage-square375arrow-up11.19Karrow-down131
arrow-up11.16Karrow-down1imageFry cooksi.imgur.comBarterClubM to [email protected]English • 8 months agomessage-square375
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-1•edit-28 months agoYour point is that if you needed surgery, then you would want it performed other than by a cook with a dirty spatula. Your point is meaningless. No one suggested that someone performing surgery would not be properly trained.
minus-square@slackassassinlink1•8 months agoThat wasn’t my point because i didn’t say that. I was explaining that the person who did was only describing how having more or less skill is true using that scenario.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•8 months agoSkill is not a quantity. You identified as a quantity duration of time invested training. You conflated an item with one of its attributes.
minus-square@slackassassinlink1•edit-28 months agoYou can have a quantity of skill. Skill is not a requirement for justice, nor is it something that should be denied from workers.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•8 months agoSkill is not a quantity, nor is it quantifiable, and your further objection embodies a straw man attack.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•8 months agoDoes an apprentice in a trade have more skill or less in his trade than a master in another trade? Again, skills differ qualitatively. At best one may conceive as a quantity a particular kind of skill, but not skill generally.
minus-square@slackassassinlink1•8 months agoOk, you concede skill can be quantified and compared. People can also have more skills than others. And, yes, generally.
Your point is that if you needed surgery, then you would want it performed other than by a cook with a dirty spatula.
Your point is meaningless.
No one suggested that someone performing surgery would not be properly trained.
That wasn’t my point because i didn’t say that. I was explaining that the person who did was only describing how having more or less skill is true using that scenario.
Skill is not a quantity.
You identified as a quantity duration of time invested training.
You conflated an item with one of its attributes.
You can have a quantity of skill.
Skill is not a requirement for justice, nor is it something that should be denied from workers.
Skill is not a quantity, nor is it quantifiable, and your further objection embodies a straw man attack.
Apprentice, tradesman, journeyman, master.
Does an apprentice in a trade have more skill or less in his trade than a master in another trade?
Again, skills differ qualitatively.
At best one may conceive as a quantity a particular kind of skill, but not skill generally.
Ok, you concede skill can be quantified and compared. People can also have more skills than others. And, yes, generally.
No. You are dishonest.