• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    28 months ago

    Not when the profit is billions, Loblaws could run at at a sizeable loss for the next decade and still be fine.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -58 months ago

      No, it can’t. 4% loss will wipe out everything they’ve earned. That’s the problem with low margins.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        18 months ago

        Yes it can, they’ve been making billions in profits every year for years. Unless they are morons and frittered away the profits, they absolutely can run at a moderate loss for years.

        Why are you defending billionaires?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            18 months ago

            Because you think the board should take the profits and be billionaires.

            I clearly understand economics better than you, because Loblaws could easily survive years running at a loss given the BILLIONs in profits they currently make annually, and the billions their owners are worth.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -58 months ago

                  It’s all relative. I know, that can be a hard concept to grasp for some, but billion is not that much when it’s a measly 4%.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    28 months ago

                    You asserted Loblaws would go under from 1 bad year.

                    That’s absolutely idiotic, Loblaws could have several bad years and have enough money in the war chest to weather that. Reletivity does not matter when they literally have billions to sustain themselves.

                    You’re inability to grasp BILLIONS is astounding. You act like it’s a million dollars.