@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 8 months agoListen, Susan. It's a valid theory, just look at the damn thing.mander.xyzimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1758arrow-down137
arrow-up1721arrow-down1imageListen, Susan. It's a valid theory, just look at the damn thing.mander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 8 months agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-squareDecoy321linkfedilinkEnglish22•8 months agoNo need to overthink a meme, but here’s my guess. They’re correlating the shapes of the objects, implying some causation. There isn’t.
minus-square@PrincessLeiasCatlinkEnglish4•7 months agoYou could say that my formations have been rocked.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•8 months agoJust be happy that you don’t get it. There are flat earthers out there who will say it unironically. Not sure if it’s only flat earthers but I think so. It really is wild
I’m obviously not getting this one lol
No need to overthink a meme, but here’s my guess.
They’re correlating the shapes of the objects, implying some causation.
There isn’t.
Ahh okay, that makes more sense. Thanks!
Are you stumped?
You could say that my formations have been rocked.
Just be happy that you don’t get it. There are flat earthers out there who will say it unironically. Not sure if it’s only flat earthers but I think so. It really is wild