Hikers rescued after following non-existent trail on Google Maps::It was unclear how the trail in British Columbia had appeared on Google Maps in the first place.

  • ANGRY_MAPLE
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’d trust it over a map that’s inaccurate, tbh. Otherwise, research, research, research.

    ETA: To me, a large part of this is situational awareness. There is almost nothing that would make me trek deep into woods on an unfamiliar path, without being as prepared as possible. You can only see so many deaths happening before it makes a mark on you. Life over convenience, personally.

    I also agree with the other person who said this stuff should be taught in school.

    • Syd@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      What you’d want is a compass and easily identifiable landmarks. You can make identifiable marks as you blaze a trail, breaking branches or marking trees, hopefully avoiding marring the bark. Generally you’ll be following a game trail anyway, it’s likely the easiest path to take.

      • ANGRY_MAPLE
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, but I still wouldn’t trust a map that doesn’t match what I’m seeing.

        I agree with you completely