Woman calls the police saying she thinks her caregiver is going to kill her and to get her out, the cops come, complement her caregiver’s weapons, and leave; hours later, the caregiver kills her.

  • slevinkelevra
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yeah, but you cut off the most insane part:

    “What did you say?” Fannell asked.

    “I said you’re fine until I kill you,” Cardana said.

    “All right? He’s threatened to do that,” Fannell said to the Rio Rancho police officers.

    “Get out of here now,” Cardana said to the officers. “Go away.”

    The two officers leave, and four hours later, 911 receives another call.

    Just… wow. Gun nuts will never do anything against other gun nuts I guess.

          • Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well, it’s weird and gross. It also pushes away anyone that owns guns and would be willing to compromise

            • qevlarr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              “As a responsible gun owner I wanted common sense gun legislation, but then someone compared my hobby to a sexual fetish, and now I think convicted domestic abusers have a right to own an AR-15”

              lol

              • Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Put words in my mouth more, daddy.

                Then keep wondering why no legislation gets passed even though 68% of the US supports stricter gun laws, me included.

            • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              This could be the most hamfisted bit of manipulation and tone policing I’ve ever seen.

              “We were just about to compromise after 25 years of spitting on children for not being pro-gun enough after their school shooting, but then I wasn’t allowed to tone police a comment that quoted two legal gun owners flirting over the upcoming murder of a vulnerable person, so instead I’m going to align myself with domestic abusers, murderers and extremists”.

              You should be thankful you’re not being called far, far worse things.

              • Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Gunowners aren’t a monolith, and treating them as such is a great way to alienate potential allies

                But by all means, keep spitting on gunowners for 25 years, that’ll make a difference.

                I’ve got a neat concept for you that you might have never heard of, it’s called “compromise”. It’s where both sides of a negotiation get some, but not all of what they want.