Critics say it’s not a trend but a fad. Whatever the case, one thing’s for sure: if you go to the movies this summer, chances are you’re going to be there for a while.

Are films getting longer? And how long is too long?

The topic’s been dominating cinema circles after Martin Scorsese’s epic Killings of the Flower Moon left people glued to their seat for more than one reason. It runs three hours and 26 minutes.

But cinemas who added an intermission off their own bat copped a whack from Scorsese’s people.

“And for good reason,” said CJ Johnson, president of the Film Critic Circle of Australia. “You have to show it as the artist intends.”

  • livusOP
    link
    fedilink
    28 months ago

    I’m low key jealous you had that job.

    Can you think of any change in the celluloid projection tech that would have changed around the time intermissions stopped being a thing?

    • @Peppycito
      link
      18 months ago

      I think the big thing was the platter system. Older theaters might have had a different setup. We had a 16mm projector that you loaded more like a class room projector, where the reels loaded on the top and bottom.

      I think movies got shorter and so fit on the platters. It was a rep theater, so we played old stuff. I remember Barry Lyndon was too long for one go.

      I was just an usher lol

      • livusOP
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        That must be one reason. I can think of plenty of 3hr+ movies I’ve seen in cinemas before digital conversion, though. Things like Malcolm X. A lot of it was probably 35mm so may have been a different system.

        I think we were kind of late to the party. Indy cinemas were still converting to digital here in the 2000s.

        I thought you were an apprentice projectionist.

        • @Peppycito
          link
          18 months ago

          No, a lowly usher. Lol! My step dad ran the theater though. Platter size and set up would definitely vary theater. Ours was new in the late 80’s so it was probably pretty state of the art for the time. I was in a chain theater projection area once and the platters were all in one room and would feed down the hall to each projector and back to the platter. We had 3 platters, one for the 7:00, one for the 9:00 and the empty one for the one showing. We’d often have to lift the movie off the platter to allow for a different one. We had these clamp things that held the roll together so it didn’t fall into spaghetti and we could swap movies. Movies are surprisingly heavy.

          • livusOP
            link
            fedilink
            18 months ago

            This is so interesting! I love hearing about stuff like this.

            I do miss the old physical films. Even the dust and scratches if a print had been circulating a while. Not sure why, it sort of feels “warmer” to me which is pretty silly.

            • @Peppycito
              link
              18 months ago

              It’s taking me down memory lane, thinking about it!