• Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          … You don’t realize that commercial entities have always built space craft for the government, so nothing you’re saying has any credibility. You should probably know something about the topic before arguing about it.

      • hoshikarakitaridia
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        “NASA already exists” if his team is doing something never done before and very helpful, that is evidence for the necessity of other space companies besides NASA.

        Edit: just so we’re clear, I don’t give two shits about Elaine Mosk.

            • tetris11@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              You need to provide counterpoints for why their comment on why space tech is unneccesary in saving the planet, otherwise people will think that you have either nothing to say, or worse still, that you think living in space is an achievable reality for your descendants (no, they won’t be part of the super rich elite)

        • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          NASA isn’t a company, and they’ve always paid contractors to make their vehicles. Crucially, noone is doing anything that hasn’t been done before.