Many Americans think of school shootings as mass casualty events involving an adolescent with an assault-style weapon. But a new study says that most recent school shootings orchestrated by teenagers do not fit that image — and they are often related to community violence.

The study, published Monday in the journal JAMA Pediatrics, analyzed 253 school shootings carried out by 262 adolescents in the US between 1990 and 2016.

It found that these adolescents were responsible for only a handful of mass casualty shootings, defined as those involving four or more gunshot fatalities. About half of the shootings analyzed — 119 — involved at least one death. Among the events, seven killed four or more people.

A majority of the shootings analyzed also involved handguns rather than assault rifles or shotguns, and they were often the result of “interpersonal disputes,” according to the researchers from University of South Carolina and University of Florida.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          37 months ago

          Sure, but there’s still a difference between school violence with guns and school violence with fists

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              0
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              “My son got beat up in school today”

              “My son got shot and killed in school today”

              It’s the guns. It’s always been the guns. And that’s why this country is uniquely dealing with this problem. It’s not hard to see it, unless you don’t want to.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  07 months ago

                  Restricting access to guns is specifically achievable (see also: most of the rest of the world) and would save many lives.

                  In tandem, sure let’s work on preventing violence in general. I’m all in favor, but achieving this semi-utopian goal seems far more challenging.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        47 months ago

        It might partially solve for it, by reducing severity of these acts, but guns are really just a means to violence. There are plenty of other ways to enact violence if that’s what you want to do.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        27 months ago

        No, that’s just a distraction the ruling class throws at us to prevent us from addressing the real issue: the disparity in wealth.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -17 months ago

              I know. It’s still way better than the US. Because guns are a bigger factor than wealth disparity, mental health care, social homogeneity, or anything else which is typically pointed to by people who value their access to guns more than other’s lives.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              07 months ago

              No the person I’m replying to is.

              While it may be a factor, I’m pointing out America is by no means unique in having these problems, such as wealth inequality. In fact all the problems so often touted as the cause for gun violence are not unique to America. The main exception is the incredible proliferation of guns and the lax regulations surrounding them.

              But many Americans love their guns, as long as they don’t have to pay the price in blood for it, they’ll continue blaming other factors…