• prettybunnys
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The technicality they’re using is that the land was purchased after the war as opposed to taken as a result of the war.

    • bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, but that land would not have been “sold” if they hadn’t lost the war. The war was fought to conquer land, and the payment was for war “reparations”.

      The U.S. agreed to pay $15 million for the physical damage of the war and assumed $3.25 million of debt already owed by the Mexican government to U.S. citizens

      Wiki