Hellfire103@sopuli.xyz to Memes@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoWATERsopuli.xyzimagemessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up1571arrow-down121
arrow-up1550arrow-down1imageWATERsopuli.xyzHellfire103@sopuli.xyz to Memes@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square51fedilink
minus-squarethreelonmusketeerslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-21 year ago roughly 2.5 times the hydrogen vs oxygen to account for inefficiencies Why 2.5 and not 2? Wouldn’t a stoichiometric mix be the most efficient?
minus-squareAngryCommieKender@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoI’m assuming this isn’t being done in a perfect environment. Some of the gases won’t react/will diffuse enough not to react
Why 2.5 and not 2? Wouldn’t a stoichiometric mix be the most efficient?
I’m assuming this isn’t being done in a perfect environment. Some of the gases won’t react/will diffuse enough not to react