Hellfire103 to [email protected]English • 7 months agoWATERsopuli.xyzimagemessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1570arrow-down121
arrow-up1549arrow-down1imageWATERsopuli.xyzHellfire103 to [email protected]English • 7 months agomessage-square52fedilink
minus-square@threelonmusketeerslinkEnglish5•edit-27 months ago roughly 2.5 times the hydrogen vs oxygen to account for inefficiencies Why 2.5 and not 2? Wouldn’t a stoichiometric mix be the most efficient?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•7 months agoI’m assuming this isn’t being done in a perfect environment. Some of the gases won’t react/will diffuse enough not to react
Why 2.5 and not 2? Wouldn’t a stoichiometric mix be the most efficient?
I’m assuming this isn’t being done in a perfect environment. Some of the gases won’t react/will diffuse enough not to react