I’m afraid I have to disagree with Elon on this. We have way too many people on this planet. It think it’s unethical to have many children when we are stressing our resources.
I’m afraid I have to disagree with Elon on this. We have way too many people on this planet. It think it’s unethical to have many children when we are stressing our resources.
What a way to say you’ve never read anything about Elon without actually saying it.
Now we get some anti-billionaire rant, just a personal attack with nothing to do with the topic.
Cite this as it’s a complete lie. It is something stupid people say because they heard it from another stupid person. CIte me which federal law or regulation requires that.
I literally just told him I used to be a fan from him. You are too closed minded.
If you don’t like “anti-billionare rants” don’t bringing up billionaires doing shit clearly for the purpose of getting more money.
It’s case law, and you probably wouldn’t listen anyways, given how your dismissing me out of hand on the other stuff.
The topic is children. Yet, you talk about billionaires. Nothing to do with the topic.
No, it isn’t. Cite it.
Crazy, I must have hallucinated Musk being in the literal title of the post you made, and in the body of the post you made, and the 6 mentions of him in the article you linked.
Yet his money isn’t the issue. The issue is dinks and children. I get you’re jealous of Elon and his fortune but it’s irrelevant to the discussion.
Saying somebody is just jealous of somebody because they are criticizing them is profoundly illogical.
Try again next time without the ad hominems.
That isn’t an ad hominem. You’re jealous of Elon or have a crush on him. Not sure which. Otherwise you’d stay on topic. Liberals have some weird fascination with Elon and Trump. I don’t get it.
So which is it that prevents you from staying on topic?
The topic is dink. Not your jealously or infatuation with elons billions.