• Corkyskog
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    They could just punch an eye hole in it somewhere and send it to some place that wants/needs clothes.

    • davidgro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure what you mean. They are (currently) explicitly making sure that the clothing never ends anywhere that wants/needs clothes - as in the goal is anti-charity.

      Under the new law, I hope they can’t take a hole puncher to it. If they are allowed, they’ll do as much damage as they legally can.

      • Corkyskog
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because you aren’t likely to run into someone with a “fake” and they couldn’t just ship them back to western countries to resell and undercut. How is that worse then them currently destroying them?

        • davidgro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh, interesting. I wasn’t aware of the reselling thing, and from the votes it seems a lot of others weren’t either. I guess if it’s just punched on something like the label/tag then that would be fine. Or maybe use permanent dye/bleach to blot it out.